Skims key facts
as of Oct 2026- Manufacturer of undergarments and loungewear intended to enhance body shape.
- Skims is valued at approximately $5.0B as of Oct 2026, set at its later-stage round, Nov 2025; nothing has traded since, per PrivateMarketView’s mark.
- It has raised $1.4B across 2 recorded rounds; the latest was Later Stage VC (Series C) ($329.6M) in Oct 2023.
- Notable investors include D1 Capital Partners, Thrive Capital, Goldman Sachs Asset Management, Greenoaks Capital Partners, Wellington Management — 12 tracked in total.
- Status: Privately Held (backing).
Valued at $5.0B at its later-stage round, Nov 2025. Nothing has traded since.
- ·The complete investor list: 12 names
- ·Watch Skims: the Monday email on marks, rounds and moves
Skims funding rounds
2 roundsWho backs Skims
12+Skims valuation
Skims was valued at $5 billion at its later-stage round in Nov 2025. That is the last priced event on record: no secondary trade or institutional fund mark has moved the figure since.
How much has Skims raised?
Skims has raised $1.4 billion in total; 2 of its rounds are on record. The largest on record was a $330 million Series C in Oct 2023.
Skims investors
12 investors are on record for Skims, including D1 Capital Partners, Thrive Capital, Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Greenoaks Capital Partners. By type, the record holds 3 venture capital firms, 2 hedge funds and 1 asset manager. The Series C in Oct 2023 drew 4 investors.
About Skims
Manufacturer of undergarments and loungewear intended to enhance body shape. The company offers a wide range of products, including bodysuits, shapewear and underwear that feature styles and color shades for different body types, enabling women of all types with support and coverage.
- Industry
- Clothing
- Sector
- Consumer Products and Services (B2C)
- HQ
- Culver City, CA, United States
- Founded
- 2018
- Employees
- 789
- Website
- skims.com/
- Ownership
- Privately Held (backing)
Is this your company? Sign in with your work email to keep it current, or tell us what's wrong.